Law of Torts - Trespass

Crossing the boundry

Trespass to person: when a person intentionally causes harm to a person's body Assault: an act by df that causes pt reasonable apprehension of e infliction of battery on him by df.


3 elements;

a. Threat to commit battery
b. Reasonable apprehension
c. Ability to carry out e threat

STEPHEN v MYERS

Df stated would rather pull pt out of his chair,
Walked towards pt. was stopped by others.

R v WILSON

'Get out your knives' sufficient to constitute assault.

R v IRELAND

Threats through phone can constitute assault if pt had reason to believe threat can b carried out by df. Even maliciously silent calls can constitute assault

TUBERVILTE v SAVAGE

Authority for conditional threat

THOMAS v NATION UNION OF MINEWRKERS

No ability to carry out threat because df was waving his fist at pt from a moving train.

Battery: Intentional & direct application of force towards another person without that person's consent


Hostile intention:


WILSON VPRINGLE

School boys playing. Df pulled pt's bag. Pt fell. Df jumped on pt. df claimed just playing.

COLLINS v WILCOCK - Bodily conduct isn't actionable If it is generally accepted as e conduct of daily life


SCOTT v SHEPPERD - Doctrine of transferred intent


Without lawful justification

MAHMOOD v GOV OF M'SIA
DANING B LAJA v KK HJ TUARAN
F v WEST BIRKSHIRE

Direct Force: Any physical contact with the body is enough.

TIONG PIK v WONG SIEW - Def liable for scratching pt's face,
HAYSTEAD v CC DERBYSHIRE - Def struck e vie 2ce in e face while to his knowledge she was holding a 3 months old baby The impact caused her to drop the child.

False imprisonment: infliction of bodily restraint which causes e pt's confinement within an area determined by the df which Isn't expressly o impliedly authorized by e law.


Elements:

- Restraint of personal liberty
- Intention
- Complete restraint (no reasonable means of escape) - BIRD v JONES

- Knowledge of pt that he was restrained is immaterial

MEERING
MURRAY

Trespass to land

Interference with goods

Defences for trespass to person


(1) Consent:

IMPERIAL CHEMICALS V SHATWELL
MORRIS V MURRAY

Emergency situations

F v CC DERBYSHIRE

(2) Lawful arrest

Section 23 of CPC:
Police/penghulu may arrest w/o warrant when:
- a seizable offence has been committed.
- reasonable complaint has been made,
- credible Info received
- reasonable suspicion.
- Burden of proof on the arrester, ABDUL RAHMAN v TAN JO KOH & SHAABAN v CHONG

Section 27 of CPC:

Citizens may arrest if in his view a seizable offence has been committed.

Section 28 of CPC:

Penghulu / citizen must take arrested to police without unnecessary delay
Police must take him to magistrate
Cannot detain a person for more than 24 hours without warrant
KUAN KWAICHOI: was detained for 52hrs before taken to magistrate.

S117 - magistrate can remand for a period less 15 days

Article 5 of Federal Constitution
(3) Rights of arrested: - grounds of arrest -lawyer – phone call
(s28A, CPC)
(a4) Ss. 28,117, CPC

(3) Reasonable condition: If pt detained under reasonable circumstances won't cause False Imprisonment

ROBINSON v BALMAIN (1 p case) HERD v WEARDALE
(4) Necessity
(5) Self-Defence
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Need Law Introduction ... click HERE
Private Policy About Us Contact Us Content References
DISCLAIMER

LAW (LLB) NOTES is intended merely as an informational and educational resource and is not intended to offer legal advice, nor does it offer legal advice. The exchange of information, by electronic mail or otherwise, relating in any way to LAW (LLB) NOTES is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship, nor does it create an attorney-client relationship.